I mean, this is just two sides of an argument, right? I mean, one side says the Earth is 6000 years old and God created dinosaurs and man in the same week and another side says the Earth is millions of years old.
Fair and balanced right? Both sides presented, he said, she said. It doesn't matter that one side has tons of studies, data and science to back it up and another side has the shit they're pulling out of their ass.
This is the crap that pisses me off, where both sides of an argument are presented equally, even though their not equal.
Like the John Kerry swift boat thing, Kerry has war wounds and purple hearts these highly funded veterens say he's lying. Even though he's been in the public eye for 30 years and all of his records look clean. And the pentagon checks it out and it turns out everything is in order.
Well, is John Kerry a liar? You decided. Even though one side is backed by public record and goverment documents and one side is all word of mouth. Equal time for unequal arguments.
So either dinosaurs lived with humans or the earth is millions of years old. Two sides of an argument that shouldn't even be happening.